Hillingdon Council Cabinet Member and Officer Decisions
Ruislip Lido Area - Results of informal consultation for a possible seasonal Parking Management Scheme
Report Document
Can't see the PDF? Download Report
Decision / Minutes Document
Can't see the PDF? Download Minutes
Text extracted from PDFs
View Report Text
Democratic Services Location: Phase II Ext: 0185 DDI: 01895 250185 CMD No: 415 To: COUNCILLOR JOHN RILEY CABINET MEMBER FOR PUBLIC SAFETY AND TRANSPORT c.c. All Members of the Public Safety & Transport Select Committee c.c. Steve Austin – Place Directorate c.c. Perry Scott – Corporate Director of Place c.c. Ward Councillors for West Ruislip and Eastcote & East Ruislip c.c. Conservative and Labour Group Offices (inspection copy) Date: 3 March 2022 Non-Key Decision request Form D RUISLIP LIDO AREA - RESULTS OF INFORMAL CONSULTATION FOR A POSSIBLE SEASONAL PARKING MANAGEMENT SCHEME Dear Cabinet Member Attached is a report requesting that a decision be made by you as an individual Cabinet Member. Democratic Services confirm that this is not a key decision, as such the Local Authorities (Executive Arrangements) (Meetings and Access to Information) (England) Regulations 2012 notice period does not apply. You should take a decision on or after Friday 11 March 2022 in order to meet Constitutional requirements about publication of decisions that are to be made. You may wish to discuss the report with the Corporate Director before it is made. Please indicate your decision on the duplicate memo supplied, and return it to me when you have made your decision. I will then arrange for the formal notice of decision to be published. Liz Penny Democratic Services Officer Title of Report: Ruislip Lido Area - Results of informal consultation for a possible seasonal Parking Management Scheme Decision made: Reasons for your decision: (e.g. as stated in report) Alternatives considered and rejected: (e.g. as stated in report) Signed ………………………………………………………Date…………………….. Cabinet Member for Public Safety & Transport Cabinet Member Report – 3 March 2022 Page 1 (Part 1 Public) Ruislip Lido Area - Results of informal consultation for a possible seasonal Parking Management Scheme Cabinet Member(s) Councillor John Riley Cabinet Portfolio(s) Cabinet Member for Public Safety and Transport Officer Contact(s) Steven Austin, Infrastructure, Transport and Building Services Papers with report Appendices A, B C, D & E HEADLINES Summary To inform the Cabinet Member on the results of the informal consultation carried out with residents and businesses in the area around Ruislip Lido to see if the majority would support the possible introduction of a seasonal Parking Management Scheme. Putting our Residents First This report supports the Council objective of Our People. Results of the consultation will be considered in relation to the Council’s strategy for parking in residential areas. Financial Cost The estimated cost associated with the recommendations to this report is £ 2,000 and will be managed by existing Transport ation revenue budgets. Relevant Select Committee Public Safety and Transport Select Committee Relevant Ward(s) West Ruislip, Eastcote and East Ruislip RECOMMENDATIONS That the Cabinet Member: 1. Notes the responses received to the informal consultation for a possible introduction of a seasonal Parking Management Scheme in the Ruislip Lido area and a possible ‘all year’ scheme for Breakspear Road between Bury Street and Howletts Lane. 2. Approves for statutory consultation to be carried out on a detailed ‘past this point’ type scheme in the wider area and a ‘signs and lines’ type scheme in Breakspear Cabinet Member Report – 3 March 2022 Page 2 (Part 1 Public) Road with operational times of 10am to 7pm, Saturdays, Sundays, Bank and Public Holidays between 1st May to 1st September. 3. Defers progressing a possible parking scheme in Laburnum Grove and Plough Farm Close at the present time but agrees to review the situation in six months. 4. Approves for statutory consultation to be undertaken on a ‘Stop and Shop’ parking scheme outside the local shopping parade on Howletts Lane with an operational time of 10am to 7pm, Saturdays, Sundays, Bank and Public Holidays between 1st May to 1st September. The maximum period of stay in these parking places is two hours with no return within one hour and no charges to park. 5. Defers taking any action on progressing possible ‘at any time’ waiting restrictions on the unrestricted on the western kerbline of Bury Street south of Breakspear Road to the start of the residential properties and a section of Breakspear Road at the present time. Reasons for recommendations The recommendations reflect the majority of responses received to the consultation with residents, businesses, and the views of the local Ward Councillors. Alternative options considered / risk management The consultation with residents and businesses offered either the option of managed parking or for no changes to be made to the current arrangements. Select Committee comments None at this stage. SUPPORTING INFORMATION 1. The Council is aware of concerns raised by residents about the detrimental impact caused by an influx of visitors to the Ruislip Lido at exceptionally busy times. Despite increased off-street parking provision and the introduction of a residents ’ permit parking scheme in some nearby roads close to the Lido, residents across a wider area can find on occasions that they suffer from inconsiderate parking. 2. In addition to many individual complaints from residents about the pressure on parking during busy periods , the Council has received various petitions organised by residents asking for measures to address the parking issues they face, particularly when the weather is favourable. Some of the petitions will be referenced in greater detail in this report. 3. As a direct result of the above, and in order to restore the balance of parking in favour of residents, Council Officers were asked to develop a resident-focused ‘Ruislip Lido Parking Cabinet Member Report – 3 March 2022 Page 3 (Part 1 Public) Management Scheme’ across the area as shown on the plan attached as Appendix A of this report 4. As mentioned previously, the Council received many individual complaints regarding parking and more recently a petition signed by 20 residents from Brickett Close under the following heading “Requesting the int roduction of Residents Permits on Br ickett Close, Ruislip”. 5. In an accompanying letter submitted with the petition, the lead petitioner helpfully put the case forward for what actions residents would like the Council to undertake which was: “The immediate introduction of residents permits signage at the front of the close such as: ’Resident permit holders parking only past this point, Sat, Sun, Bank Holidays and Public Holidays 9am to 7pm, 1 st March to 1st September. 6. It is also understood that the Cabinet Member and Local Ward Councillors were approached by residents of Standale Grove, who were also concerned at the influx of non- residential parking associated with visitors to the Lido on warmer days. 7. As a direct consequence of all the representations received from the local community over the on-going parking issues in the summer months, the Cabinet Member for Public Safety and Transport, with the support of the Local Ward Councillors, asked Council Of ficers to conduct an informal consultation in an area agreed by them , on a possible Parking Management Scheme. 8. As the parking issues in the area ar e unique and are focussed mainly in the summer months, the scheme proposed after extensive consideration by officers and members had the following special operational aspects: • The scheme would operate every day between 1st May to 1st September between the times of 10:00hrs and 19:00hrs. • All proposed double yellow lines would apply all year round. • All of the roads included in the “past this point” scheme w ould form an entire parking scheme zone, meaning no parking transfer can take place between zones. • All parking registrations w ould be free of charge and be in the form of an online or telephone registration. However, only residents can apply for registration / “virtual vouchers” • There are no set limits to the number of vehicles that can be registered to one address; however, the Council would reserve the right to refuse applications for excessive numbers of registrations / virtual vouchers. • Visitors' vehicles to a resident address would be required to be registered and could be applied for on the day of a visit ; this is also free. If the number of visitors ’ vehicles registrations is excessive, the Council reserves the right to refuse to accept registrations. • No ‘residential’ type parking registrations would be accepted within the residential area for any of the adjacent businesses. Cabinet Member Report – 3 March 2022 Page 4 (Part 1 Public) • Blue Badge holders may still park within this scheme if they display a valid badge. • Registration will not be accepted for vehicles over 2.30 metres high or 5.30 metres long. • Registration is not required for motorcycles. • The scheme w ould only apply to the public highway (in other words, ‘highways maintained at the public expense’; parking within privately-owned areas off the road will remain as existing. 9. To establish if the majority of residents would support the introduction of a scheme, each property in the area to be covered in the ‘past this point’ scheme was delivered a n information letter, an introductory letter from the Cabinet Member, a plan of the proposed scheme design, a reply-paid envelope, and a questionnaire to ask if they would like their road to be included within a possible Parking Management Scheme. 10. Responses received to the consultation are summarised in Appendix B , with more extensive comments tabulated in Appendix C. However, overall, in the area where the Council is proposing a seasonal ‘past this point’ type Parking Management Scheme, 119 responses were received in favour of the proposals and 52 responses indicat ed that they are happy with the current arrangements. Responses from Laburnum Grove were balanced, with two residents indicating support for a possible scheme and two against. All three responses received from Plough Farm Close were against a possible scheme. As these two roads are relatively self-contained small residential cul-de-sacs on the periphery of the proposed parking management area, it is recommended not to progress a scheme in these roads at the present time but to review the situation in six months. 11. The Cabinet Member will recall that, in addition, a petition with 21 signatures was submitted to the Council from residents of Breakspear Road. Within their petition residents raised the following issues and helpfully suggested some possible solutions: “Breakspear Road, Ruislip Parking Management. Due to the overflow of traffic and congestion from Ruislip Lido – Petition for temporary control following onto residents parking bays for a permanent basis. 12. Breakspear Road is a busy road that is occupied by a mixture of residential properties, commercial and industrial premises and provides access to Breakspear Crematorium. It also forms part of the 331 bus route. There is currently a mixture of ‘at any time’ and 8am to 6.30pm every day waiting restrictions on the northern side of the road between the junction of Bury Street and the start of the residential properties. On the south side of the road there are limited parking controls in front of the many businesses that occupy this section of road. 13. The Cabinet Member may recall that a Parki ng Management Scheme was introduced in Withy Lane, a residential cul -de-sac adjacent to Breakspear Road following a petition submitted by residents. Their concerns were over non-residential parking associated with employees of local businesses and a van hire business. Following consultations with residents, a lines and signs Parking Management Scheme was subsequently implemented which operated every day between 8am and 10pm. On the basis of a lack of any adverse Cabinet Member Report – 3 March 2022 Page 5 (Part 1 Public) feedback from the formerly concerned residents, it would appear that the scheme in Withy Lane was a success. 14. Given the proximity of Breakspear Road to Withy Lane and the petition submitted by residents, it was agreed with the Cabinet Member and Ward Councillors that a mor e traditional type scheme be offered to residents of the road, which could operate every day between 10am and 7pm. The operational aspects of the proposed parking scheme here were as follows: • Permit holder parking places operational everyday throughout the year between 10am and 7pm. • Sections of limited double yellow lines to prevent obstructive parking. • Single yellow lines everywhere else including in front of residents’ driveways with above operating times. • An independent parking scheme zone separate to all surrounding roads. • As explained above , all parts of Breakspear Road between the junctions of Howletts Lane and Bury Street would be subject to parking restrictions as show in the attached plan. • Permits are vehicle specific and must be for a vehicle registered to an address with the scheme. • As the purpose of this scheme is to prevent non- residential parking, no parking permits w ould be provided to any of the businesses situated on Breakspear Road. • Blue badge holders may park in residents' bays so long as they display their badge. • Permits will not be issued for vehicles over 2.30 metres high or 5.30 metres long. • Permits are not required for motorcycles. • As mentioned at the start of this letter a separate scheme operational on a seasonal basis is being progressed in the surrounding streets and this is also subject to informal consultation at this stage. Enclosed is an area plan highl ighting the scheme being proposed in the vicinity of Breakspear Road. 15. Again, residents who live on Breakspear Road were delivered a letter, plan of the proposed layout of the parking scheme, an information letter, a letter from the Cabinet Member , a reply-paid envelope, and a questionnaire. 16. The responses to the Council’s consultation on a possible parking scheme for Breakspear Road showed an overall support from residents for managed parking of some kind but , perhaps unsurprisingly, there was some opposition from local businesses. 17. However, during the consultation it appears that a resident of Breakspear Road contacted their neighbours and as a result undertook their own consultation on an amended scheme of a form that they believed would be more appropriate for their road. In essence, the consultation undertaken by residents themselves was asking whether Breakspear Road should be included in the nearby seasonal parking zone. The question posed in this consultation was “Would you like to be consulted/included in the Pink Zone free and seasonal parking management scheme” and then an option to choose ‘yes’ or ‘no’. Cabinet Member Report – 3 March 2022 Page 6 (Part 1 Public) 18. The resident who arranged this consultation has helpfully provided all the responses to Council officers and, from the 27 residents who responded, all indicated they would prefer to be part of the nearby seasonal Parking Management Scheme. Following a disc ussion with the Cabinet Member it is recommended that the Council formally consult residents of Breakspear Road on the seasonal operation times and the other operational aspects of the wider scheme. It is also recommended that Breakspear Road is formally consulted on a ‘lines and signs’ type scheme as a ‘past this point’ scheme is unlikely to work at this location, given the challenges residents claim are caused by customers and deliveries to local businesses. 19. As mentioned previously, the responses from local businesses were very much against a scheme c iting the lack of parking opportunities for customers and employees. It is understood that the Cabinet Member has been in discussion with the business community and as a compromise, has agreed not to progress the proposed ‘at any time’ waiting restrictions on Bury Street which will provide an opportunity for employees to park. It is also recommended that part of Breakspear Road is left unrestricted as shown on the plan attached as Appendix D. 20. The Cabinet Member will recall that a petition signed by 97 residents of the area close to the local shopping parade in Howlett’s Lane was submitted to the Council under the following heading “Petition for the stop and shop scheme – which allows a strict parking scheme. Please sign this petition to help our valuable customer and the shopkeepers”. 21. This vibrant local shopping parade in Howlett's Lane provides an essential range of services to the local community and sits within the area that could form part of the Ruislip Lido seasonal parking scheme. Considering the petition and the desire to maintain the viability of local shopping areas, the C abinet Member and Local Ward Councillors asked officers to develop a possible scheme for the area in front of the shops and to consult with the business owners at the same time as the wider consultation. 22. On Howlett's Lane the Council pr oposed short stay parking bays directly in front of the shopping parade to provide a generous turnover of parking for customers, with a maximum stay of up to two hours free parking. To maintain a consistent approach to parking across the area it was agreed t hat, between 1 st May and 1 st September, the bays would be enforced every day from 10am to 7pm. For the remaining months of the year , and with a view to provide a turnover of spaces, it was proposed that the bays would operate Monday to Saturday between 7am and 10pm. 23. A separate letter was sent to the businesses on Howlett's Lane seeking their views on the proposal. No responses were received so it is recommended that the Council includes these proposals in the wider formal consultation subject to the Cabinet Member’s approval. 24. All responses to the informal consultation have been tabulated in Appendix C to this report; however, there were some common issues that were raised by residents which are set out below. Cabinet Member Report – 3 March 2022 Page 7 (Part 1 Public) 25. “Concerns over dropped kerb enforcement if residents or visitors obstruct driveways” When parking in an entire road or network of roads which is reserved solely for permit holders, it is possible to provide signs at the entrance to the road and dispense with many of the signs and bays markings within the road itself. 26. The benefits of this type of schem e are that it reduces the visual impact on the area and allows residents and their visitors to maximise the use of the available space. However, as the whole road is in effect a parking area, then in theory if someone were to park across another resident’s dropped kerb who has either a valid electronic permit or visitor voucher, enforcing against this is not possible while the scheme is in operation. The reality is somewhat different as experience in other areas would indicate that this rarely if ever happens. If in the future this area experiences several instances of obstruction to driveways occurring, then this type of scheme can be reviewed. 27. “Would like the months the scheme operates to be extended to include Easter holidays and September when the weather can be good”. As the Cabinet Member will be aware, the date of Easter is always the first Sunday following the first full moon that occurs af ter the first day of spring. Thus, the date of Easter Sunday can fall any time between 22 nd March and 25 th April. Having looked at the temperatures and weather at Easter for the last 10 years, only two had fair weather and temperature in excess of 15 degrees Celsius. Whilst it is appreciated that September can experience warmer weather than at Easter , as schools return and f amilies return to a more settled routine, there is generally less parking pressure on the residential roads. On balance the Cabinet Member is happy to ask officers to formally consult on the scheme to operate between 1st May and 1st September. If, however, the situation becomes problematic for residents, then the months the scheme operates can be reviewed. 28. The other comment most frequently made by residents who responded is that “ The scheme should only operate on weekends and bank holidays” . As more families are choosing a “staycation” which can involve day trips to local attractions, the parking pressures in the area around the Lido are now not solely confined to weekends and bank holidays. The Local Ward Councillors receive many complaints from residents regarding parking problems associated with the Lido and the occurrences are not confined to weekends, especially in August when the schools have broken up and the weather tends to be pleasant. 29. To summarise, the responses received to the consultation indicates a preference for a seasonal parking scheme in the area as proposed by the Council. The responses from residents of Breakspear Road indicate support for a scheme with similar operational aspects to the wider scheme. No negative responses were received to the proposed ‘stop and shop’ scheme. It is therefore recommended the Council formally consults on the area wide scheme wi th the amendments recommended in this report in an area indicated on the plan attached as Appendix C to this report. Cabinet Member Report – 3 March 2022 Page 8 (Part 1 Public) Financial Implications The estimated cost to carry out statutory consultation on detailed design for the proposed area - wide seasonal Parking Scheme is approximately £2,000 and will be managed within existing Transportation revenue budgets. If a scheme is subsequently proposed to be implemented, suitable funding would need to be identified. The cost of implementing a scheme is estimated at £50,000 and would require additional Cabinet Member approval. RESIDENT BENEFIT & CONSULTATION The benefit or impact upon Hillingdon residents, service users and communities This will provide residents the opportunity to comment on a detailed design for a possible seasonal Parking Management Scheme in the area. Consultation carried out or required An informal consultation was carried out with residents and businesses in an area agreed with ward councillors. CORPORATE CONSIDERATIONS Corporate Finance Corporate Finance has reviewed the recommendations to this report and concurs with the financial implications as set out above. Legal Further legal advice will be given, as necessary, once the statutory consultation has taken place. Infrastructure / Asset Management None at this stage. Comments from other relevant service areas None at this stage. BACKGROUND PAPERS Petitions received. Cabinet Member Report – 3 March 2022 Page 9 (Part 1 Public) TITLE OF ANY APPENDICES Appendix A – Informal consultation area plan Appendix B – Proposed formal consultation area plan Appendix C – Table of informal consultation results Appendix D – Detailed responses to the informal consultation Appendix E – Plan of Breakspear Road Road Name I would support the introduction of a Parking Management Scheme. I would prefer no changes to the current parking arrangements. Number delivered Number responded Percentage responded Arlington Drive 9 8 37 17 46% Boston Grove 8 0 19 8 42% Breakspear Road 13 7 51 20 39% Brickett Close 15 9 93 24 26% Bury Avenue 12 2 23 14 61% Bury Street 15 3 54 18 33% Howletts Lane 23 12 75 35 47% Laburnum Grove 2 2 13 4 31% Old Howletts Lane 0 1 1 1 100% Plough Farm Close 0 3 9 3 33% St Catherines Road 10 3 29 13 45% Standale Grove 25 6 81 31 38% Stanford Close 25 21 7 33% 134 61 506 195 38% Ruislip Lido Area Outcome of informal consultation for a possible Parking Management Scheme YES Since we moved in, the parking situation has become worse. Not just from the Lido but from residents who own more than one car. There should be road markings that say resident parking and the alloted parking spaces should have the house number painted in the space. I have spoken to a local councillor and asked if the deeds could be looked at to see if the car spaces are for certain properties in the grove. We sometimes have problems geting out of the road due to the parking. YES Non-residents dumping cars in parking spaces. A car full of rubbish, flat tyres, a complete wreck has been dumped near to me for the last two years.......................... NO ............................................... ....................................................................................................................... ..................................We would like reassurance that should the proposed restrictions be introduced [larger vehicles can still be parked on the road]. YES NO It will be very difficult for us to register cars as family live in different areas of the country.................................................................................................................................................... To be honest now the new double yellow lines have been put at the top it's not too bad coming and going most days. YES I am in favour of PMS in my road but only if it is run as proposed. I do not believe that I should pay for vouchers for my family to come and visit. YES Appendix D Sheet 25 of 28 The Council cannot allocate parking places on the public highway to individual properties. Footway parking is not curently permitted in Standale Drive and may be reported to the Council Parking Enforcement Team. A permit will not be required if the vehicle is parked in a private area. The current proposals are to not charge residents for permits. YES To our minds this is the best solution yet. It seems to address everyones concerns re parking management. There now seems to be no room for complaint. YES I think permits will reduce amount of cars etc. YES Please ensure all parking restrictions allow suitable access for emergency vehicles - offending vehicles should be towed away immediately. If the Lido is used for public functions outside the proposed "seasonal times" I would like the same restrictions to apply. YES Very good scheme! But, the Council needs to be very careful that the option of registering the cars which frequently park at residents addresses is not abused and becomes an "additional income" for some residents who may be willing to register the other peoples cars for a payment. YES It should mirror the current scheme down Resevior Road (Apr-Oct), further signs on out of an area map to advise that it's a residential area and to be courteous of the people who live there. Its not nice sturggling to get back to your house to find out you can't park at your house due to Lido visitors. I also wish they would stop using the green area adjacent to Bury Street and Standale grove as a public loo. YES YES YES I have sent many emails over 3 years. Can it run until 1st October as September is still warm, and the holidays are still running? Parking across dropped kerbs should not be allowed to permit hiders, except the resident. YES YES Residents cars are much more of a priority in getting their vehicles parked, far more so than visitors! Certainly in high seasons like the summer and even late spring/early autumn. Appendix D Sheet 26 of 28 This request has been covered in the main report. The use of virtual visitor vouchers will be monitored by the Parking Permits Team This request has been covered in the main report. This request to change the operational times has been covered in the main report. The parking over dropped kerbs rules change is a consequence of a 'past this point' scheme and the legislation that makes this type of scheme possible. In order to 'protect' drpped kerb as we do now would require a traditional 'signs and lines' type scheme. This would only be a issue during the operational hours of the scheme and enforcement would carry on as it does now at other time. YES NO I suggest a sign at the entrance to Standale Grove should be highly visible, which it isn't at the moment stating RESIDENTS PARKING ONLY! YES Although I'm not happy a Parking Management Scheme as Standale Grove has always been a quiet residential area but in the last 3 years we have had an influx of visitors from outside the borough in the summner months making our lives a complete misery and it cannot go on, so I have accepted this scheme has to go ahead. However my main concerns that the new Parking Scheme will cause a lot of distress to my neighbours and myself as it will force other people to park in our parking bays outside the back of our homes. For the last year we have been constantly contacting different departments at Hillingdon Civic Centre trying to get clarification on our parking bays. ......................................................................................................................................................................................... ......................................................................................................................................................................................... We have to get this sorted before the parking scheme comes in as this is a very 'grey' area due to no one in the Council confirming in writing who owns the land (yes, we have checked with Land Registry). ........................................................................................................................................................................................ YES YES NO Perhaps some more H18 busses would be appreciated in holiday times and hot weekends as it is sometimes impossible to get on them for us OAPs. This is what is being proposed. Appendix D Sheet 27 of 28 The ownership of non-public highway areas of land are beyond the remit of this report/consultation. Ruislip Lido 2021Breakspear Road, RuislipProposed Parking Management SchemeJan 2022 This map is based upon Ordnance Survey material with the permission ofOrdnance Survey Survey on behalf of the Controller of Her Majesty'sStationery Office © Crown copyright.Unauthorised reproduction infringes Crown copyright and may lead toprosecution or civil proceedings.London Borough of Hillingdon 100019283 © 2022Residents Services, 3N/04, Civic Centre, High Street, UB8 1UW,London Borough of HillingdonTel 01895 250 631 NTSAppendix E
View Decision / Minutes Text
Executive Decision Notice – 18 March 2022 Page 1 This notice is a public document also available to view on the Council's website www.hillingdon.gov.uk OFFICIAL EXECUTIVE DECISION NOTICE PUBLISHED BY DEMOCRATIC SERVICES Notice is hereby given that the following decision(s) have been made today by Cabinet Members at the London Borough of Hillingdon: Title of decision Ruislip Lido Area - Results of informal consultation for a possible seasonal Parking Management Scheme Reference No. 415 Date of decision Friday 18 March 2022 Call-in expiry date 5pm, Friday 25 March 2022 Relevant Select Committee(s) Public Safety and Transport Select Committee Relevant Ward(s) Eastcote & East Ruislip, West Ruislip Decision made Cabinet Members making the decision Councillor Jo hn Riley - Cabinet Member for Public Safety & Transport Approved That the Cabinet Member for Public Safety & Transport: 1. Noted the responses received to the informal consultation for a possible introduction of a seasonal Parking Management Scheme in the Ruislip Lido area and a possible ‘all year’ scheme for Breakspear Road between Bury Street and Howletts Lane. 2. Approved for statutory consultation to be carried out on a detailed ‘past this point’ type scheme in the wider area and a ‘signs and lines’ type scheme in Breakspear Road with operational times of 10am to 7pm, Saturdays, Sundays, Bank and Public Holidays between 1st May to 1st September. 3. Deferred progressing a possible parking scheme in Laburnum Grove and Plough Farm Close at the present time but agrees to review the situation in six months. 4. Approved for statutory consultation to be undertaken on a ‘Stop and Sh op’ parking scheme outside the local shopping parade on Howletts Lane with an Executive Decision Notice – 18 March 2022 Page 2 This notice is a public document also available to view on the Council's website www.hillingdon.gov.uk operational time of 10am to 7pm, Saturdays, Sundays, Bank and Public Holidays between 1st May to 1st September. The maximum period of stay in these parking places is two hours wi th no return within one hour and no charges to park. 5. Deferred taking any action on progressing possible ‘at any time’ waiting restrictions on the unrestricted on the western kerbline of Bury Street south of Breakspear Road to the start of the residential properties and a section of Breakspear Road at the present time. Reason for decision The recommendations reflect the majority of responses received to the consultation with residents, businesses, and the views of the local Ward Councillors. Alternative options considered and rejected The consultation with residents and businesses offered either the option of managed parking or for no changes to be made to the current arrangements. Classification Part 1 - Public Link to associated report Report found here. Relevant Officer contact & Directorate Steve Austin – Place Directorate Any interest declared by the Cabinet Member(s) / dispensation granted N/A Implementation of decision & scrutiny call-in [Internal Use only] When can this decision be implemented by officers? Officers can implement Cabinet Member decision in this notice only from the expiry of the scrutiny call-in period which is: 5pm, Friday 25 March 2022 However, this is subject to the decision not being called in by Councillors on the relevant Select Committee. Upon receipt of a valid call-in request, Democratic Services will immediately advise the relevant officer(s) and the decision must then be put on hold. Councillor scrutiny call- in of this decision Councillors on the relevant Select Committee shown in this notice may request to call-in this decision. The request must be before the expiry of the scrutiny call-in period above. Councillors should use the Scrutiny Call-in App (link below) on their devices to initiate any call-in request. Further advice can be sought from Democratic Services if required: Scrutiny Call-In - Power Apps (secure) Executive Decision Notice – 18 March 2022 Page 3 This notice is a public document also available to view on the Council's website www.hillingdon.gov.uk Further information These decisions, where applicable, have been taken under The Local Authorities (Executive Arrangements) (Meetings and Access to Information) (England) Regulations 2012. This is the formal notice by the Council of the above executive decision, including links to the reports where applicable. If you would like more information on this decision, please contact Democratic Services on 01895 250636 or email: democratic@hillingdon.gov.uk. Circulation of this decision notice is to a variety of people including Members of the Council, Corporate Directors, Officers, Group Secretariats and the Public. Copies are also placed on the Council’s website. Democratic Services London Borough of Hillingdon Civic Centre High Street Uxbridge UB8 1UW